A COUPLE OF RESPONSES TO LUKE FORD'S PRAISING MOCKERY :: Simply Jimmy D :: Breakin' News or Breakin' Balls: It's all the same to me!

jimmyd _writes "A few stories down I cut-and-pasted DUC's (i.e., Luke Ford's) praising (sic) mockery of me. His prose has generated a couple of responses which I feel obligated--as a responsible and professional pornalist--to share.

Cali Ruchala, a renowned and respected cyber-journalist who normally writes about matters of a bit more importance than this, had this to say.

Cali writes: Jimmy-- I think you and DUC, that Vietnamese master of disguise, need to sit down (in the presence of a third party - that is absolutely crucial) to work this out. The goddamn Chicago Manual of Style indicates that only one thing can be compared to an "opening flower," and I don't think you have one. The Jungian interpretation isn't much better. This is a classic cry for help.

Come to think of it, I do remember receiving a letter like that in the fifth grade. If DUC doesn't have braces, knee-socks and mosquito-bite nipples, I might think about taking a different route home if I were you... Be careful out there. --Cali

That was classic Cali with his gloves on. If Luke ever becomes a war-criminal or an evil despot, the gloves will come off and he'll cyber-suffer brutally at the hands of my Serbian friend.

Over on the Jizz Bizz Message Board, Hangman posted on this subject under the heading, "Mocked You Were, Jimmy!"

Hangman posts: "If this is in confluence with the "Zero Flaming" policy, please forgive me.

"One of LA's most savage media profilers" is also one of LA's most ridiculously self-important has-beens (and that's SAYING something!), and try as he did, he could not hide the sting he felt from your observation regarding his lack of taste. I saw the post on setgo and I was thoroughly sickened by the sheer stupidity and insensitivity of the reference. I am almost sure that he knows your opinion reflected that of most of the (warm-blooded) people who read that tasteless garbage, and all the sarcastic, prose-laden ramblings (almost Sullivanesque, in a way) can't make up for the fact he could, and should, have found a better reference for his catchy headline for the article he lifted from you in the first place.

He's doing his best to be underhanded in punishing you for the audacity you showed in calling it as you saw it (which IS your responsibility as a member of the cybernetic fourth estate), hoping that you'd pass it off as the real thing. The DUC (Duck?) was, is and always will be the porno equivalent of the fat kid at the party who didn't get laid once too often, and is now in the habit of spewing venom at a community that never wanted him around anyway.

On the other hand, What do I know about taste? I thought the seal thing on Mike's (South) site was hilarious.
_________________
Hangman out.

"


	Search


WARNING · Extreme Adult Content Discretion Advised